Law In Saudi Arabia As It Pertains To Licensure Of Physicians

Law In Saudi Arabia As It Pertains To Licensure Of Physicians

Create a presentation examining the law in Saudi Arabia as it pertains to licensure of physicians and medical malpractice as shown in the Ministry of Health. (2005, December 6), Law of practicing health professions.  Be sure to include:

An analysis of the purpose of the law;

The ethical principles guiding this law;

The definition of “medical malpractice” written in your own words

How the requirements detailed in sections 1 & 2 aid in preventing malpractice

Recommendations that would improve the law to further meet the goals of its purpose.

Your well-written presentation should meet the following requirements:

Be 10 slides in length, with eight content slides in addition to the title slide and at least one reference slide (you may add as many reference slides as you need if you include more than 4 articles). Presentation notes (100-150 words) are required for each slide.  Notes must draw from and cite relevant reference materials.  Add notes to the speaker’s notes section of the PowerPoint presentation.  Submit the document in PowerPoint format so that the speaker’s notes can be viewed by the instructor.

Provide support for your statements with in-text citations from a minimum of four scholarly articles in the speaker notes as well as the references slide.

COVID 19 Pandemic

COVID 19 Pandemic

Paper #1 (250 min two scholarly sources)

With looks to the COVID 19 Pandemic there are several theories floating around as to how it began, how we navigate as a society etc. Research COVID 19 and tell us your theory overall regarding the state of our nation. Please remember to supply at least two scholarly sources and your initial discussion must be at least 250 word minimum.

Paper #2 (250 min two scholarly sources)

This week we will discuss classical and neoclassical theories. Provide an example of an item (can be as simple as paper towels, toilet paper, bleach etc. that are coveted in our most recent situation) and discuss it from both perspectives.

Paper #3 (250 min two scholarly sources)

Research the COVID 19 Pandemic and relates it to one of theories covered in our text this week.

Paper #4 (250 min two scholarly sources)

We will discuss subculture theories this week. Research a group of your choice (hippies for example) and discuss how they have evolved or devolved as a group, in clothes, appearance, causes etc.

Paper #5 (250 min two scholarly sources)

Discuss feminism, the primary interest of feminologists and four different types of feminist thought.

Developmental Assessment And The School-Aged Child

Developmental Assessment And The School-Aged Child

The needs of the pediatric patient differ depending on age, as do the stages of development and the expected assessment findings for each stage. In a 500-750-word paper, examine the needs of a school-aged child between the ages of 5 and 12 years old and discuss the following:

  1. Compare the physical assessments among school-aged children. Describe how you would modify assessment techniques to match the age and developmental stage of the child.
  2. Choose a child between the ages of 5 and 12 years old. Identify the age of the child and describe the typical developmental stages of children that age.
  3. Applying developmental theory based on Erickson, Piaget, or Kohlberg, explain how you would developmentally assess the child. Include how you would offer explanations during the assessment, strategies you would use to gain cooperation, and potential findings from the assessment.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Managed Care Organizations (MCOs) Vs. Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) profile

Student Sumetria

The differences and similarities between Managed Care Organizations (MCO) and Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) will be explained below.

The MCO is a group of medical providers and facilities that provide care to its members at a reduced cost. Many MCO’s require the patient to have a primary care provider. The ACO is a group of medical providers and medical facilities that work together to provider collaborative care to its members. The ACO doesn’t require the member to have a primary care provider.    The providers work together voluntarily to provider care as a medical team for the patient. The different specialties work with each other to treat the patient with continuity of care. The information is shared so that all the providers that are treating the patient are aware of the medications, tests, hospital visits. And treatment the patient has currently and the past treatments. The providers that are part of the MCO’s don’t work as a team to provider collaborative care to the patients.

collaborative care to the patients.

They don’t strive to work together to treat the patient with the team approach like providers in the ACO’s strive for. The MCO groups can share information if it is requested. The focus is not continuity of care.  Some providers send their notes to the referring provider as a courtesy.  The ACO’s are still changing to become better.  The MCO’s and ACO’s may transform and merge into one entity to meet the needs of consumers.

They both are similar enough to the point where I think they can be combined with the best interest of the consumer in mind. I believe that we can take the best features from both of them. Considering the current health care environment , continuity of care is important. This is the best way to treat the patient with the best possible outcome. Having the providers work together as a team avoids having the patient take medications that interact, repeating the same tests. And other wasteful or harmful medical practice. This approach can also reduce the cost of medical care. The cost of medical care is constantly increasing and I think this is a way to reduce the cost of medical care. This will help control wasteful spending.

Managed Care Organizations (MCOs) Vs. Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs)

“Managed Care.” MedlinePlus, U.S. National Library of Medicine, 25 Sept. 2017, medlineplus.gov/managedcare.html.

 

“What Is an ACO? Definitive Guide: Accountable Care Organizations.” Health Catalyst, Health Catalyst, 24 Oct. 2017, www.healthcatalyst.com/what-is-an-ACO-definitive-guide-accountable-care-organizations.

 

Student 2 Kpanbu

Health care spending is the biggest drive for formulating the different kinds of payment systems in healthcare. Health care insurance enrollees may obtain care from various Managed Care Organizations (MCOs) or Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs).

Managed Care Organizations (MCOs): is a group of people working together to manage the cost of health care.  MCOs work along with medical facilities and health care providers to render support to MCO patients, only pays for the care provided and its plan is not as flexible as ACOs and MCOs give incentives to physicians like the ACOs. There are four types of MCOs: Health Maintenance Organization (HMO), Preferred Provider Organization (PPO), Exclusive Provider Organization (EPO), and Point-of-Service Plan (POS).

According to (Andrews, 2014), HMOs only pay within network health care and insurers need a referral to seek care from a specialist or else the services provider will not be covered. For PPOs, care is covered both in and out of the network, however. The patient pays a higher premium for out of network care.  In EPO, care is not covered outside of the network, nevertheless; patients do not require referral to get seen by a specialist.  In POS, plan varies between HMOs and PPOs, and insurers may seek out of network care but with a higher cost-sharing rate. PPO and HMO both have Medicare options.

The Ethical Principle of Providing Healthcare for Deaf Patients

The Ethical Principle of Providing Healthcare for Deaf Patients

 

College of Nursing, Resurrection University

NUR 4242: Ethics in Nursing

The Ethical Principle of Providing Healthcare for Deaf Patients

The deaf community is a vulnerable population with a language barrier when accessing healthcare (Laur, 2017). Due to their condition, deaf patients cannot hear, preventing them from effectively communicating with providers and nurses about their health. According to the American with Disabilities Act, hospitals and clinics must have communication methods for patients and family members who are deaf or hard of hearing (United States Department of Justice, 2005). A sign-language interpreter is trained to effectively communicate with the patient using American Sign Language (ASL). The interpreter is an advocate for the patient and helps communicate with healthcare professionals throughout their hospital stay.

The Ethical Principle of Providing Healthcare for Deaf Patients

This communication includes the patient’s chief complaints, signs/symptoms, tests, medications, procedures, and treatment. When a health care professional overlooks the patient’s condition and does not address the patient’s communication needs, miscommunication occurs, leading to misdiagnosis from the physician or delayed medical treatment. This is a significant issue to investigate because they do not provide a level of standard of care for the patient. There is a breach of ethical and professional duty leading to negligence and lawsuit against the hospital. This paper investigates the principle of treating deaf patients, the impact of a language barrier when accessing healthcare and the moral responsibility in providing care to the deaf community.

Ethical Dimensions of Limited Access to Healthcare

Limited access to health care for the deaf community is an ethical problem. There are 6 million deaf patients in the United States of America and 38 million people with hearing problems (Laur, 2017). They are not receiving equal access to health care and services as abled individuals. According to the ADA, all locations must have accessibility and proper communication for an individual with a disability (U.S. Department of Justice, 2005).

This lack of accessibility leads to health disparities for individuals in the vulnerable population, such as the deaf community for resources, transportation, nutrition, education, advocacy, and health promotion. Furthermore, deaf patients are at a disadvantage because they need additional help and undergo ethnocentrism due their disability. Deaf community has negative connotations and has experienced victimization and discrimination with terms such as, “deaf-dumb”, “deaf-mute” or hearing impaired meaning they do not have a voice and nor have to ability to learn or have reasonable thinking (National Association of Deaf, 2020).

Ethical Challenges In Managing Social Media

Ethical Challenges In Managing Social Media

The grading guidelines are as follow:

Ethics Final Paper–Evaluation Rubric Possible Score Your Score
Introduction:  Summary of what is known about the ethical issue

Well summarized (20)  Adequately summarized (15), Superficially summarized (10)  Poorly summarized (5)

 

20
Ethical Dimensions of the Issue Identified and Discussed (why is this an ethical issue)

Clearly Identified (5), Superficially identified (2), Not identified (0)

Clearly Discussed (5), Superficially discussed (2), Not discussed (0)

 

10
Relevance of the Ethical Issue to Health Professions/Nursing

Relevance of the Ethical Issue to Nursing well described (10), Adequately described (7), Poorly summarized (3)

10
Relevant Ethical Analysis (Principles, Ethical Theories, Laws, and Standards of Practice)

 

Complete Analysis of Principles, Ethical Theories, Laws, and SOP (30)

Adequate Analysis (15), Superficial Analysis (10), Poorly Analyzed (5)

30
Personal Professional Response to the Issue

Thorough discussion (10), Adequate Discussion (7), Superficial Discussion (5)

10
Conclusion: Reflection of What you Learned

Reflection clearly articulated (8), adequately articulated (6), superficially articulated (4), poorly articulated (2)

8
Spelling, Punctuation and Grammar—pdf. version of paper WILL NOT be accepted and will result in a grade of zero points for the assignment without discussion

 

No errors (10), 1-2 errors (8), 3-4 errors (6), 5 or more errors (4), errors obscure meaning or the instructions for the assignment were disregarded (2)

 

10
Clarity and Organization – Rubric Headings utilized

Headings utilized, paper clear/concise/organized (10)

Headings not utilized, paper clear/concise/organized (7),

No Headings, paper unclear/ not concise/disorganized (5),

Lack of organization obscures meaning or you have not corrected feedback given in prior assignments (2)

health-care initiative

health-care initiative

Research a health-care initiative or legislative statue that is currently underway in your state or federally. You may want to check with nursing organizations that have legislative departments that can provide their analysis on current health-care issues. You may also conduct online research to identify current issues. Discuss how you can take an active role as a health-care advocate (at the local, state- CA, or federal level as appropriate). Identify one tacitic to advocate for your identified initiative or legislation.

Expectations

Due 3/31

  • Length: A minimum of 250 words, not including references
  • Citations: At least one high-level scholarly reference in APA from within the last 5 years

Leading Innovation In Nursing

Characteristics of Adaptive Leaders

 

Know your Environment: Adaptive DNP leaders should embrace the uncertainty of the changing healthcare environment and look for new approaches to achieve the health outcomes of their patients. This may not be the time to be sticking to the rules of the previous volume-based model of care. Those leaders who develop different perspectives. That go beyond the tradition way of thinking, and encourage their team members to do the same, can adapt to. And thrive, in the new value-based model of healthcare.

Lead with Empathy: Adaptive DNP leaders should embody an interprofessional, collaborative, attitude. Through this type of attitude, they will understand alternative perspectives and be able to respond with empathy. Adaptive DNP leaders should reward their employees with autonomy to work independently. And manage their own activities. It is through this type of intrinsic motivation that employees are allowed to grow and contribute to the organization.

Learn from Self-Assessment and Reflection: During this time of organizational change. Adaptive DNP leaders should encourage experimentation to improve processes that lead to positive patient experiences and outcomes. Some experiments may fail, but failures can serve as lessons for the future. Adaptive DNP leaders should encourage their teams to reflect on both their successes and failures. It is important that employees are able to trust the team to identify mistakes and problems in order to respond quickly to them.

Find the Win-Win Solution: Adaptive DNP leaders value platforms for cooperation and build on them. Healthcare depends on multiple layers of stakeholders including providers, suppliers, insurers. And teams of support personnel. Adaptive DNP leaders need to include these stakeholders in the new value-based model in order to sustain a changing economical business model. Value-based care cannot be provided without having a win-win solution for the transition from volume-based care.

Adaptive DNP leaders

Description

To be innovative, you have to be willing to act like a scientist and challenge assumptions.

Lesson Summary

Innovative leaders are willing to think and act like a rogue—they willingly challenge assumptions.

Individuals can become more innovative by acting like a scientist. To start, keep a record of hypotheses for new ways of getting things done.

Treat these hypotheses as experiments and come up with options for things you might do differently.

treatment of pediatric patients requiring antidepressant therapy

treatment of pediatric patients requiring antidepressant therapy

To prepare for this Assignment:

The Assignment: 5 pages

Examine Case Study: An African American Child Suffering From Depression. You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this patient. Be sure to consider factors that might impact the patient’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes.

At each decision point, you should evaluate all options before selecting your decision and moving throughout the exercise. Before you make your decision, make sure that you have researched each option and that you evaluate the decision that you will select. Be sure to research each option using the primary literature.

Introduction to the case (1 page)

  • Briefly explain and summarize the case for this Assignment. Be sure to include the specific patient factors that may impact your decision making when prescribing medication for this patient.

treatment of pediatric patients requiring antidepressant therapy

Decision #1 (1 page)

  • Which decision did you select?
  • Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
  • Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
  • What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
  • Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.

Decision #2 (1 page)

  • Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
  • Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
  • What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
  • Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.

Decision #3 (1 page)

Sexual Morality and Equality and Discrimination

Title: Sexual Morality and Equality and Discrimination

2 Pages

3 References

APA

 

Sexual Morality and Equality and Discrimination

This week, please complete the following tasks:

First, please carefully read chapter 12 on sexual morality and chapter 13 on equality and discrimination.

Second, begin your single post by including the actual % of the readings that you read this week.  For example, you might write at the top of your post:  “I read 85% of this week’s reading.”  Be truthful, since your answer will affect your grade.  Please do not use decimals in your answer!

Third, please fully respond to the following FIVE massive essay questions appearing here:

Sexual Morality and Equality and Discrimination

1. What is the difference between conceptual and factual matters with regard to sexual morality?  What are some factual matters that would be relevant for consequentialist arguments regarding sexual behavior?

2. Kantian ethics objects to deceit, manipulation, and coercion.  According to these Kantian objections, what kinds of sexual activity would be considered morally objectionable?

3. Explain how Natural Law theory might be used to determine the ethical morality of masturbation, premarital sex, prostitution, pornography, birth control, adultery, and gay marriage.  Do you agree with Natural Law theory on these matters?  Why?  Why not?  Explain how Virtue Ethics theory might be used to determine the ethical morality of masturbation, premarital sex, prostitution, pornography, birth control, adultery, and gay marriage.  Do you agree with Virtue Ethics theory on these matters?  Why?  Why not?

4. Summarize the likely Utilitarian arguments for and against affirmative action; summarize the likely Kantian arguments for and against affirmative action.

5. Evaluate the ethics of racial profiling; evaluate the ethics of hate crime legislation.   Make sure to include a discussion of the implications of the principle of equality, civil rights, and the ethics of preferential treatment in your answer.

As always, students who cite their readings (with page # references) in their answers receive better grades!