You will write a position paper related to opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) to oil drilling. You will be assigned a “side” and expected to vigorously advocate your position. You are expected to be informed of the arguments for and against opening the Refuge. Consider yourself a professional policy advocate. Also note that you may be assigned to represent a position with which you do not agree. That is part of the exercise. You may not have a choice. You should focus on the following question:

Should the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge be Opened to Oil Drilling?

My position is in favor of: Should the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge be Opened to Oil Drilling?

This assignment requires you to write an academic article about contemporary nursing leadership that could potentially be submitted to a journal for publication. (2800-3000 words) and 12 sources

First you need to choose a suitable journal that you could submit your article to.

Tip – find some published articles on leadership, look at the journals they are published in and choose several you think might be suitable for your article. Then search for the journal home page in Google or a similar search engine and find their author guidelines. For example, the JAN author guidelines can be found here -> https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/page/journal/13652648/homepage/ForAuthors.html. The author guidelines for every journal include their own specific guidelines / information about the types of articles they publish, referencing requirements, writing style, article length limits etc. Also take careful note of how articles are structured in your chosen journal to gain ideas for how you might structure your own article. Your article must have (as per the rubric) an introduction discussion and conclusion as minimum but you can use the journal guidelines to help you structure your paper as well.

You can write about contemporary nursing leadership in any way you like – but your topic must not be too broad. You need to choose a specific issue that you want to explore in more depth.

If you’ve been on any social media platform, you’ve undoubtedly seen it happen: an argument breaks out between friends or family members on different sides of an issue. Differing opinions become rigid dividing lines; participants split into opposing camps. Facts and evidence are used subjectively; logical fallacies abound. Some participants resort to emotion or even name-calling. At the end of the day, everyone is angry, and no one has changed their mind about the issue at hand. If anything, people have dug their heels in even more.

How can we continue to disagree, and engage one another in a debate, without devolving into the scenario above? One solution is to just disengage or retreat into the so-called social media “filter bubble” of like-minded perspectives. But arguably our future as a country, or even as a global community, depends on the free exchange of ideas and a willingness to question, learn from, and challenge one another.

So in the discussion this week, we’ll put the critical reading, thinking, and argumentative reasoning skills we learned this week to work to engage in a civil debate on one of two topics relating to the future of our society. Before beginning, remember: the goal here is to maintain good netiquette and avoid the common pitfalls of arguments – name-calling, appealing to emotion, ignoring or distorting the facts.

I will attach a file below for how to do this assignment

1- I will list one pdf for the a book and the others will be links. you should take from each sources 2 points

2-The first pdf is for the book (Food & Society) by Gubtill 2nd edition so you should site it. when you write about it

My chosen topics are Nurse Burnout and Falls

You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

Note: Research evidence must not be more than five years old.

Note: Upload a copy of the full text of the articles with your submission.

Note: You may use the same topic and research articles on both Task 1: Analyzing Research Articles and Task 2: Evidence-Based Practice Change.

A. Evaluate a primary, quantitative research, peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications by doing the following:

Note: You may select an article focusing on a healthcare topic of your choice or an article focusing on one of the following topics: falls and fall prevention, pain management in children, opioid abuse, hepatitis C, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, or hand hygiene and infections in hospitals.