This readings discuss the idea of governance where government partner with others to fulfill the needs of the public, and trust in government. Do you think that government partnering with contractors and nonprofits is the best choice for public service? What are some of the risks and benefits? Do you think these partnerships improve or hurt public trust in government? based on Goodsell, chapters 2-3

• Responses will be 1-2 pages long, 12 pt. font, and double-spaced.
• Responses are given a letter grade based on the following:
  • Use proper grammar and are well written in an essay structure
  • Utilize all of the book club readings for the week
  • Show strong critical thinking and thoughtful reflection

  please spend more time developing your own thoughts and reflections of the readings.

• APA Format
• the rubric and ch 2-3 in the attachment

Thank you

Read Chapter 4 and answer them using the book as a reference

1-which of the following behaviors may be (1) ethical but illegal, (2) legal but unethical, (3) illegal and unethical, and (4) legal and ethical.

A. Working in a clinic that performs abortions

b. Respecting the wishes of a client suffering from ALS that he be permitted to die with dignity and not placed on “breathing machines”

c. Respecting the health surrogate’s wishes regarding termination of life support of her friend

d. Observing a coworker take out two tablets of oxycodone as ordered for pain management for his patient but keeping one for himself, administering only one tablet to the patient.

2-differentiate among the following: deontological theories, utilitarianism, and principlism.

3-what do you think about health-care professionals disclosing information to clients about a poor prognosis, even though the information may cause severe distress.

4-What do they think about health-care professionals disclosing information to clients against family wishes?

5. You see a colleague use another nurse’s password to access the medication administration system and take out a narcotic. What would you do?

Grading Criteria to be met:

Clearly states the behavior they would like to change

Clearly states the reasons for this desired change in behavior

Clearly states what they think will be the hardest part of changing the behavior AND why

Clearly states what they think will be the easiest part of changing the behavior AND why

Uses correct spelling and grammar and is 1-page or less

In a page or less, discuss the behavior you plan you would like to change for the Behavior Change Process project this semester. Address each of the elements above to ensure maximum points are earned.

Here are some prompts that may help you:

1.Scan your life and ask yourself: Where would a lasting change in behavior benefit me most?

2.Choose a behavior that you would like to change permanently.

3.Write down the behavior you would like to change and post it somewhere where you will see it every day.

This is a class of political science. The assignment involves finding an article about international relations on New York Times and please summarizing it.

Note: The article must be find in “opinion” area on New York Times website!!! You can find this button on home page.

Instructions

• Group Counseling: Strategies and Skills Corey et al.: ch. 6
• Group in Action DVD

Reflection Paper Instructions

Watch all the segments in the First and Second Program on the Groups in Action DVD while following along in the workbook, reading the commentaries by Corey et al. (2014), and reflecting on the questions. You will then write a short Reflection Paper which must be submitted as a Word document on Blackboard. The paper must be engaging, substantive, and interesting. It must include self-reflection and personal application, not merely a summary and critique of what you viewed and read. Examine new insights about yourself as an emerging group leader from the perspective of a biblical worldview.

The paper must be 3–4 pages (1,000–1,300 words), not counting the title or reference pages (no abstract is necessary). Although you may use first person in this paper, remember it must be in current APA format. The paper must be well written, well organized, and free of grammar, spelling, or other writing errors. Address the following 2 topics by integrating relevant ideas from Corey et al. (2014) and Jacobs et al. (2016). Subheadings are unnecessary.

• Identify, by name, the group member in the first or second program with whom you identify with the most. Explain why you identify with this person, i.e. what experience or issue were you able to relate to? Briefly describe 1–2 situations in which this member was working. What thoughts, feelings, fears, etc. did the member articulate? What skills and techniques did the group leaders (Jerry and Marianne Corey) use to guide the working member and to deepen the focus? How were other group members involved in this process?
• The Coreys established specific group norms in the beginning stage by encouraging group members to speak up, articulate their feelings, talk out loud, address one another, look at each other, and actively participate. These norms laid the foundation for interpersonal learning involving direct talk and role play in the present. Note how the leaders asked questions such as “Is there someone here you can relate to?” and “Who in here are you aware of right now?” to deepen the focus. Discuss your observations and reflections on how these and other leadership techniques used by the Coreys promoted therapeutic benefits for the group members.