doctrine of sovereign immunity

PAPER#1(KJ):

It was not until recent years that state and local governments. Could be sued due to the doctrine of sovereign immunity. The doctrine of sovereign immunity stated that a governing body of its representatives could not be sued. Because it made the laws in the first place (Schmalleger and Smykla, 2020). Even while confined in prison, inmates still have civil rights. Federal and state prisoners can file lawsuits with the federal courts stating that their civil rights have been violated by correction officials (Schmalleger and Smykla, 2020).

However, not all cases brought to court by inmates are a violation against their rights and at the end of the Prisoners’ Rights Era. Courts had become less sympathetic to prisoners’ claims, as many were frivolous lawsuits (Schmalleger and Smykla, 2020). In order to protect correctional officers changes were made at the state and federal level which have slowed the number of case prisoners have brought against officers (Schmalleger and Smykla, 2020).

The Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act was changed in 1980 which forces a prisoner to use all means necessary at the state level before a writ of habeas corpus can be filed at the state level (Schmalleger and Smykla, 2020). It can be challenging to sue government officials for allege misconduct and one hurdle that must overcome in order to do so is the qualified immunity doctrine that shields the government official from lawsuits unless the defendant’s conduct violated a right constitutional, or the right was clearly established at the time the misconduct took place (Lass, 2018).

REFERENCES:

Lass, Z. (2018). Lowe V. Raemisch: Lowering the Bar of the Qualified Immunity Defense. Denver Law Review, 96(1), 177-201.

PAPER#2(PR):

Classmates,

 doctrine of sovereign immunity

Sovereign immunity is an English law based on a common law principle that the King could not do any wrongdoing. And this law applies to state and federal governments (“Sovereign Immunity,” n. d.). Therefore, sovereign immunity says that the federal and state government cannot be sued without their permission (“Sovereign Immunity,” n. d.). The reasoning behind this law was that if the individuals who made these laws should not be compelled by it (Schmalleger and Smykla, 2020). The federal and state governments can waive their right to sovereign immunity through the Federal Tort Claims Act. Which put aside federal immunity for certain wrong claims (“Sovereign Immunity,” n. d.). The Westfall Act says that a feral worker cannot be prosecuted while employed. Some states have complicated laws that have prohibited immunity through governmental action.

100% Original Work

Zero Plagiarism

Graduate Level Writing Required.

DUE: Saturday, April ,17 2021 by 5pm Eastern Standard

BACKGROUND:  You will be working on the Criminal Justice Program Proposal throughout this course. This is a cumulative assignment, this is a follow up on the previous assignment. 

This Project will be based on the following subject: 

                     Information Sharing (SEE ATTACHED CASE STUDY) <—–Very Important

Resource: “Seven Stage Model for Planned Change.”

Research possible programmatic solutions by benchmarking best practices. Your program goals and objectives must be based on industry best practices.

Write a 1,250- to 1,400-word proposal for a program that solves the problem identified in the case study you selected in Week One. Address the following:

• Identify two or three goals of your program.
• Describe outcome objectives for each goal.
• Determine the resources needed to implement the program.
• Identify how you plan to elicit stakeholder participation.

Format your analysis consistent with APA guidelines.

PLEASE NOTE: There needs to be at least three different peer reviewed literature references

Wikipedia, dictionaries, and encyclopedias are not peer reviewed literature references.

 Adapting Internal Policies And Practices

. Competency Discussion

Discussion Topic

 

For your Competency Discussion, consider the importance of transparency, accountability, and compliance training in a healthcare facility. Where you work or one with which you are familiar. Then think about how healthcare administrators fulfill this important training need within their organizations. Finally, if available to you, interview a leader (at the director or vice president, managerial, or supervisory level) in a healthcare facility to get his or her insight on the purpose and importance of transparency, accountability, and compliance training. Be sure to download the interview guide as an aid to working on this discussion.

To begin this Competency and meet your required engagement. Lost in the Discussion area a brief description of how healthcare administrators at a facility with which you are familiar fulfill the training needs related to transparency, accountability, and compliance. Then explain the purpose and importance of these training issues.

If the option of conducting an interview was available to you, describe role of the healthcare administrator you selected for the interview. Then, explain any insights you gained from the interview and whether your opinion about the importance of transparency, accountability, and compliance has changed based on what you learned in the interview.

2. Module 1 Pre-Assessment Submission

Assessment Submission

 Adapting Internal Policies And Practices

Note: Although this formative pre-assessment is not graded, a submission is required before you can advance to your summative assessment.

The Module Pre-Assessment is your opportunity to practice applying module content before submitting the final Competency Assessment. In the Final Assessment. You will be asked to develop a report that describes the key elements of the Medicare Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) established in the Affordable Care Act.And identifies factors from a statistical report on unplanned readmission rates that contribute to the risk of failing to meet the HRRP criteria. You will also be asked to describe three programs or activities based on SMART goals you create that would help increase reimbursement under HRRP by reducing readmission rates.

For this Module Pre-Assessment, create an outline that reflects the key elements of HRRP and the factors at Brooklyn Presbyterian Hospital based on the statistical report of unplanned readmission rates that contribute to the risk of failing to meet the HRRP criteria. Your outline should also include the five SMART goals you created to help Brooklyn Presbyterian Hospital earn the maximum reimbursement by following the HRRP criteria and the three programs or activities you would recommend to help the hospital increase reimbursement under HRRP by reducing readmission rates.

Note that you do not have to resubmit your Pre-Assessment to address feedback.

3. Module 3 Pre-Assessment Submission

Assessment Submission

 Adapting Internal Policies And Practices

Note: Although this formative pre-assessment is not graded, a submission is required before you can advance to your summative assessment.

The Module Pre-Assessment is your opportunity to practice applying module content before submitting the final Competency Assessment. In the Final Assessment. You will be asked to develop an action plan in a slide presentation that maximizes reimbursements and adapts to change.

To prepare for your Final Assessment, consider what strategies you might use in your action plan to maximize reimbursement under HRRP. Reflect on what behavior changes you could recommend for providers. And patients to achieve maximum reimbursement. Finally, think about what resources you can secure to put your plan into action.

For this Module Pre-Assessment, create an outline of your slide presentation. Suggestions for your outline include the headings for each slide. The strategies you might use to maximize reimbursement under HRRP. The behavior changes you recommend for providers and patients to achieve maximum reimbursement and what resources you can secure to put your plan into action. You do not need to complete slide presentation for this pre-assessment. Only an initial outline is required.

Introductory Speech Outline

Overview

Strong oral communication skills will be valuable to you throughout your academic journey. They are in high demand by many employers. Creating an outline is critical to your success in crafting an effective speech.

For this assignment, you will create an outline. The speech based on your outline is due next week.

Instructions

1. Select either Topic A or Topic B for your introductory speech.
   • Topic A: Elevator Pitch. Deliver an elevator pitch that describes your professional background and experience for a potential employer during a job interview.
   • Topic B: Dream Career. Discuss your dream career.
2. Create an outline or speaking notes in Microsoft Word.
   • Download the Sample Outline [DOCX], which provides guidance for the structure of an outline.
   • Focus your speech on 2–3 main points so you’ll stay within the 2-minute time limit.
3. Submit the completed outline in a Microsoft Word document.

Requirements

Your assignment will be graded according to the following criteria:

The outline

• is complete and on topic.
•  provides solid flow for the speech.
•  is clear and free from spelling and grammar issues.

This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:

• Outline a speech using a structured flow and proper spelling and grammar.

Week 2 Assignment Overview:

Formation of Sales and Lease Contracts

Business Law

Tenth Edition

Chapter 18

Formation of Sales and Lease Contracts