benefits could be an important part of the recruiting interview

IPsec, SLL/TLS Standards, And VPN Security

Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) provide a secure data flow between two endpoints. There are not only different types of VPNs, but there are also different Internet security standards for implementing security in these different VPN types.

In this assignment, you will classify the three different types of Virtual Private Networks (VPNs). You will compare the features of the IPsec and SLL/TLS Internet security standards. You will then evaluate these two Internet security standards for implementing security in the three different types of VPNs.

Instructions

Write a 3 – 5 page paper in which you:

1. Classify the three different types of Private Networks (VPNs).
   • Distinguish the characteristics of each type in terms of configuration (e.g., host-to-host), transmission technology (e.g., multiplexing), and ease of implementation.
2. Compare the two different Internet security standards of IPsec and SLL/TLS in terms of features they provide for security, strengths, and weaknesses.
3. Evaluate the IPsec and SLL/TLS standards for implementing security in the three different types of VPNs.
   • Your evaluation for each VPN type should include the VPN type, your proposed Internet standard for implementing security in this type of VPN, and the rationale behind your evaluation.
4. Reflect on your learning experience in this assignment, the lessons you learned, and how this experience would apply to your personal or professional life.

This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The library is your home for SWS assistance, including citations and formatting. Please refer to the Library site for all support. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:

• Evaluate Internet security standards for implementing secure Virtual Private Networks (VPNs).

Moral Controversy, Debate, Disagreement, and or Dispute

Ethical Perspectives on Abortion

Abortion triggers intense ethical debates due to deeply rooted positions. In favor of making the right choices, supporters of the given argument state that a woman’s right to self-determination prevails own her body that evident in reproduction rights and bodily autonomy judgment. They contend that mandating pregnancy continuation infringes on women’s freedoms, potentially burdening them physically, emotionally, and financially. Some argue the essence of the stance prioritizes the sacredness of human life instead of choosing abortion. They argue against abortion, viewing it as a morally shameful act due to its termination of an innocent life. The deontological arguments for this stance are rooted in the idea of a basic right to life of any unborn fetus and the ought to remain a human being as is without being harmed before they make it to the world.

The opposing viewpoints reflect fundamental disagreements regarding individual autonomy, rights, and the value of life. In matters of privacy and individual liberty, proponents stress the issues of personal concern such as the burden of unwanted pregnancies if a pregnancy is unplanned or occurs unexpectedly. Conversely, abortion proponents stress the moral imperative to protect and preserve all human life, including that of the unborn (Kaczor, 2022). The ethical discussion around the matter of abortion is deeper than the laws: it explores deeper questions of what we believe is right and fair as human beings. Advocates prioritize women’s rights and they stress that there are adverse effects of abortion.

From an Ethical Egoist perspective, individuals prioritize their self-interest above all else. A proposition from an Ethical Egoist might disregard either of the divisions of abortion assuming that this is tied to their interests or purposes. They may justify their position by arguing that supporting abortion rights preserves individual freedom and autonomy, which ultimately benefits the self. However, the question of a person’s loyalty to where he or she comes from or to the community at large should awaken in respect of advocating for abortion rights because such disregard is a threat to potential future members of society.

The implication of abortion in what is known as a Social Contract Ethics perspective. It is brought about by examining the issue within the context of the societal ethos. They would perhaps demand a balance where the individual right is acknowledged at the same time communal needs are met. A Social Contract Ethicist might find his/her position justified by the fact that it is important that the social fabric is preserved and the welfare of all members of society is granted. The disagreement on abortion, as such, might easily end up being a battle between personal autonomy and social norms, as separate individual rights and common principles respecting the humanity which is in the life clash. The instruction of Social Contract Ideology is an effective solution to this situation where the dialogue between the government and the community. The development of regulations that are based on the compromise between the freedom of choice for individuals and the advancement of society is suggested.

The code of professional ethics is undoubtedly central in regulating health workers’ behavior as they deal with ethical concerns in abortion. Codes of conduct covering the circumstances as provided by the American Medical Association (AMA) should be looked on as something valuable that one is ready to face those pressing situations. The AMA notes the right of a doctor to professionally object when participating in an abortion procedure, but at the same time, they stress the survival of access to legalized medical care. Through this consent, one understands that there is a thin line that separates the attitude of professionals and the feelings of the individual as well as that of the family whose rights to live may be in opposition with certain medical procedures. The ethical demands on health workers in these situations are special whereby they must be aware of their ethical responsibilities while at the same time appreciating the patient’s rights and autonomy.

During birth control, healthcare providers would make an individual choice between their convictions and their duty to render care to the patients. For example, when faced with the situation of a patient who came to a clinic for an abortion, the physician might have an inward conflict simply because he/she is morally against the procedure of terminating a pregnancy (Dozier et al., 2020). Professional responsibilities and personal views should be considered and should be realized with consideration of the ethics of the code. First, the AMA’s principles emphasize abiding by those rights at all times, whatever the provider or organization’s viewpoint is on the issue. The provision of neutral health information and any help needed to make reproductive health decisions by nurses as well as doctors is the key duty of healthcare professionals.

All the ethical dilemmas of abortion are complex as the various aspects, as well as ideas, are considered. It is essential to examine the various roles in the light of these ethical terms, like Ethical Egoism and Social Contract Ethics, and such an undertaking can make us aware of the ethical principles that are involved and the disputes that might arise. Social Contract Ethics stresses that one should be fair to other people and fulfill their obligations when one uses an individual’s freedom. Providers of healthcare must necessarily take into account abortion as a concept that is inseparable from the governing arrangements and reciprocal agreements of society.

In conclusion, the ethical paradox concerning abortions is one of moral complexity which involves several convictions and perceptions determined by different areas of thought. Navigating the complexity of this issue, healthcare professionals should observe their ethical responsibilities, but respect patients’ rights and autonomy. Basing on the principle of encouraging respect while finding a fine balance between individuals’ rights and social responsibilities can give direction to the proper direction for such disputes.

References

Dozier, J. L., Hennink, M., Mosley, E., Narasimhan, S., Pringle, J., Clarke, L., … & Rice, W. S. (2020). Abortion attitudes, religious and moral beliefs, and pastoral care among Protestant religious leaders in Georgia. PloS one, 15(7), e0235971.

Kaczor, C. (2022). The ethics of abortion: Women’s rights, human life, and the question of justice. Routledge.

Essentials of Health Policy and Law

**Read rubric verbatim***

What to Submit

Your submission should be a 2- to 3-page Word document. You must also include an APA-style title page. Use 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and 1-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style.

Reading: Essentials of Health Policy and Law, Chapters 2, 3, and 12

Textbook link:https://bncvirtual.com/vb_econtent.php?ACTION=econtent&FVENCKEY=AD9EE8D798DCAFC7E76B5FB7C978DD86&j=43766531&sfmc_sub=1597096465&l=23329524_HTML&u=695880241&mid=524003857&jb=40753&utm_term=10242022&utm_source=transactional&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Direct_Ebooks

Article:https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/MLN-Publications-Items/MLN4649244

Article: https://www.cms.gov/priorities/key-initiatives/hospital-price-transparency

Article: https://healthcare.uslegal.com/liability/

Article:https://www.hanover.com/businesses/business-customer-resources/hanover-risk-solutions/identifying-risks-healthcare

Summarize the facts in the selected case study and use the three components

1. Select one of the case studies presented in the Assessment 03 Supplement: Applying Ethical Principles [PDF]Download Assessment 03 Supplement: Applying Ethical Principles [PDF]
   • Note: The case study may not supply all of the informatioun yo  needIn such cases, you should consider a variety of possibilities and infer potential conclusions. However, please be sure to identify any assumptions or speculations you make.
2. Summarize the facts in the selected case study and use the three components of an ethical decision-making model to analyze an ethical problem or issue and the factors that contributed to it.
   • Identify which case study you selected and briefly summarize the facts surrounding it. Identify the problem or issue that presents an ethical dilemma or challenge and describe that dilemma or challenge.
   • Identify who is involved or affecte
   • d by the ethical problem or issue.
   • Access the Ethical Decision-Making Modelmedia piece and use the three components of the ethical decision-making model (moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior) to analyze the ethical issues.
     • Apply the three components outlined in the Ethical Decision-Making Model media.
   • Analyze the factors that contributed to the ethical problem or issue identified in the case study.
     • Describe the factors that contributed to the problem or issue and explain how they contributed.

3. Apply academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to an ethical problem or issue as evidence to support an analysis of the case.
   • In addition to the readings provided, use the Capella library to locate at least one academic peer-reviewed journal article relevant to the problem or issue that you can use to support your analysis of the situation. The NHS-FPX4000: Developing a Health Care Perspective Library Guidewill help you locate appropriate references. You will select at least one current scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles published during the past 3–5 years that relate to your topic.
     • Cite and apply key principles from the journal article as evidence to support your critical thinking and analysis of the ethical problem or issue.
     • Review the Think Critically About Source Quality
       • Assess the credibility of the information source.
       • Assess the relevance of the information source.

4. Discuss the effectiveness of the communication approaches present in a case study.
   • Describe how the health care professional in the case study communicated with others.
   • Assess instances where the professional communicated effectively or ineffectively.
   • Explain which communication approaches should be used and which ones should be avoided.
   • Describe the consequences of using effective and non-effective communication approaches.
5. Discuss the effectiveness of the approach used by a professional to deal with problems or issues involving ethical practice in a case study.
   • Describe the actions taken in response to the ethical dilemma or issue presented in the case study.
   • Summarize how well the professional managed professional responsibilities and priorities to resolve the problem or issue in the case.
   • Discuss the key lessons this case provides for health care professionals.
6. Apply ethical principles to a possible solution to an ethical problem or issue described in a case study.
   • Describe the proposed solution.
   • Discuss how the approach makes this professional more effective or less effective in building relationships across disciplines within his or her organization.
   • Discuss how likely it is the proposed solution will foster professional collaboration.
7. Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
   • Apply the principles of effective composition.
   • Determine the proper application of the rules of grammar and mechanics.
8. Write using APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references.
   • Determine the proper application of APA formatting requirements and scholarly writing standards.
   • Integrate information from outside sources into academic writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, following APA style.

Case Study: Medical Treatment Against Cultural Beliefs
John Blackrock, a 50-year-old renowned Native American artist known for his intricate beadwork
and paintings, is diagnosed with an early-stage form of lung cancer at the Evergreen Health
Clinic. The diagnosis comes as a shock to John, who has always led a healthy lifestyle, deeply
rooted in the traditions and practices of his ancestors.
Upon discussing treatment options, Dr. Emily Stone, a young oncologist with a passion for
patient-centered care, recommends a combination of surgery followed by chemotherapy. She
1

believes this approach offers John the best chance of full recovery. However, John, deeply
connected to his cultural roots, expresses his wish to forgo the conventional treatment. Instead,
he wants to seek healing through traditional Native American practices, which include herbal
medicine, spiritual rituals, and guidance from tribal elders.
Dr. Stone, while respectful of cultural diversity, is deeply concerned. She’s seen patients with
similar diagnoses recover fully with the right medical interventions. She fears that without timely
treatment, John’s condition might worsen, making his prognosis grim. She’s also aware that
John is a significant figure in his community, and his choices might influence others.
Dr. Stone, recognizing the principle of autonomy, understands that the final decision rests with
John. However, she also feels the weight of beneficence, wanting the best possible outcome for
her patient.
2