Treatise on Government & Discourse on Inequality

4 assignment , three assignment about the book(Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Discourse on Inequality)

one assignment about (Locke, John. Second Treatise on Government) I don’t have them. needs 8 pages total so 2 pages for each. if you want to write more I will give high rate and extra support.

Need for Environmental Sustainability

The specific topic of your research paper is up to you! Nevertheless, your topic must relate to the broader issue of global sustainability. The Research Paper must be at least 5 pages in length, not including a title page (optional) and a page of references. A minimum of three references, one of which is not online, must be used as sources, and must be listed on the reference page. References should be listed in APA format, and any quote must be properly attributed. Again, students should use double-space line spacing, normal 1 inch margins, and 11 or 12 point type in an easy-to-read font (e.g. Calibri, Arial, Cambria or Times New Roman). Papers should demonstrate the student’s ability to write in proper grammatical sentences and use proper paragraph structure. Be sure to include your name on the paper itself and also be sure to number your pages!

Utilitarianism and Kantianism

Word document titled Essay is the Assignment.

Please make sure to look at the outline and try to use it as the guide just as instructed.

A Brief Coda on Atheism

Hi there,

Please see the attachment for materials. It’s two page long as the previous one you work on.

Which details does Prothero shares about atheism to justify the inclusion of a chapter on atheism in his text? In your opinion, what might be some of the benefits of including Atheism in our study of religion? Disadvantages? If we include atheism in our study of religion, does that somehow change our definition of religion, why or why not?

Reflection on Issues for Identity and Ethics

hello i want you to make me 3 style of this hw for 3 people the file is attached

Extra credit Discussion Board: After reading the above article “On Black-Brown Relations,” reflect on issues/implications for identity and ethics this discussion raises and engage with others in online discussion. This discussion is for the entire class (not groups) and will be open throughout the remainder of the semester for up to 10 extra credit points in participation.

The Lives of Animals Quest to Accord Animals Same Rights as Humans Reflection

These are 2-3 page commentaries on reading assignments. In them you can raise questions, analyze arguments, or simply point out something that you found interesting about the text. I uploaded the article, please read first and then write the reflection paper of it. Please deliver on time with high quality and no plagiarism.

 

Aristotle and Stoicism Reflective

For this assignment, I’d like you to apply what you have learned from Aristotle and Stoicism to your life during the Covid19 crisis.

I am looking for one paragraph on Aristotle and Covid19 and one paragraph on Stoicism and Covid19.

Consequentialist & Non Consequentialist Approaches to Ethics

  • In your own words, describe the primary difference between consequentialist and non-consequentialist approaches to ethics.
  • Choose one of the major theories associated with consequentialism: what objections might be made to this theory?
  • Choose one of the major theories associated with non-consequentialism: what objections might be made to this theory?
  • Around 300 words

Deductive and Inductive Reasoning

(NOTE: Include both Task 1 & 2 responses with main types of arguments (Deductive & Inductive) in a single post, and then you must respond to three colleague posts. Be sure to clearly indicate which Task (1 or 2) you are responding to.)

Hi everyone,

We have learned this week about deductive reasoning, including what it takes for an argument to be valid. This discussion allows us to get more practice with the concept through making arguments valid. You will see a list of arguments here. These arguments are not presented in standard form, and each is missing a premise that would be necessary to make it valid. Your tasks will be to put the argument into standard form and add the missing premise that would validly link the premises to the conclusion.

Prepare: To prepare to respond to this prompt, reread the section from Chapter 2 of our book titled “Extracting Arguments in Standard form,” all required portions of Chapters 3 and 4, as well as the guidance and required media for this week. Further assistance in the filling missing premises can be gained from watching the video Constructing Valid Arguments. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. .

Prisoner Dilemma Experiment

Thought Experiments are creations of the imagination used by philosophers to investigate thoughts, ideas, reasoning and understanding. They are used in a variety of philosophical disciplines: ethics, metaphysics, epistemology, logic, for example. Typically, philosophical thought experiments present a narrative, or story, that describes a counter-factual or hypothetical situation. The person engaged in the thought experiment is often asked to imagine themselves as a subject in the experiment, under the conditions the experiment dictates. In this way, philosophers can explore the personal knowledge acquired by such experiments, and use it to further their own understanding.

For this assignment, discover a philosophical thought experiment that appeals to you, describe this experiment in your paper as well as its origin (who made it and why?), and describe the logic of the experiment (what is it supposed to teach?). Finally, explain what you personally learned by engaging in the thought experiment, and how you might use your new knowledge.