Transforming Education: The Scholarship Of Discovery

/in /by

The purpose of this reflection paper is to review our past content.  With our ever-changing society, healthcare and nursing are constantly evolving.  Evidence-based practice provides critically-appraised and scientifically proven evidence that will improve quality patient care, improve patient outcomes, and reduce healthcare costs (Majid et al., 2011).  Nurses are in the perfect position for this transformational change to promote optimal patient outcomes in practice.

ADDRESS ALL QUESTIONS WITHOUT LEAVING ANY POINT OUT

1. Using any past textbooks and readings, as well as at least one peer-reviewed professional article, please reflect on the present state of nursing education and where you see research is needed to promote optimal nursing practice. Why is this research important to you? How is it transformative? Provide detail explanation and examples. Personalize where it needs.

2.  As a nursing professional, how can you also get involved in clinical research? Where would you start? With whom can you network in order to get involved? Provide detailed explanations and examples. Personalize where it needs to and provide detailed explanation.

3.  Give at least two examples of active-learning, evidence-based practice strategies that you could provide in nursing. How can these strategies transform nursing practice? Provide detailed examples. 

  • apply at least one peer-reviewed professional article  from the field of nursing to your reflection.
  • Include A title page and reference list in APA formatting,      7th edition are expected.

DO NOT PLAGARIZE

Humanities

/in /by

formulate, express, and support individual perspectives on diverse works and issues.

For this assessment task, you are asked to act as a critic for one of the various subjects under the umbrella of the subject Humanities. Through a series of critiques. You will be demonstrating your background knowledge on these subjects and the themes studied in the Humanities. In general, a critic evaluates a work or piece based on a common language of a subject. For example, certain terminology is used in the film industry for aesthetic. Whereas other terminology is used in architecture. Aside from a common language of art. Each subject usually includes a history of influence-how a work was influenced by other works and how a work influence aspects of today’s art and culture. Critics use this common body of history and aesthetic to offer critiques. Or judgements on the validity of the importance of aesthetic (it’s representation of beauty).

Please watch the video below (02:33 – 16:32) as a refresher on this deliverable’s content. The video will not tell you everything you need to know to pass this test-out, but it should serve as a refresher.

From Data to Knowledge and Wisdom!

/in /by

From Data to Knowledge and Wisdom!

 

Info System In Health Care

 

How  does data become knowledge and finally wisdom? Explain the relationship  between knowledge acquisition, knowledge processing, knowledge  generation, knowledge dissemination, and wisdom. Then provide examples  from your clinical practice according to the  following:

Examples of knowledge;

  1. acquisition
  2.  generation
  3.  processing
  4. dissemination
  5.  of the use of feedback

Incorporate health outcomes of the health promotion

/in /by

Incorporate health outcomes of the health promotion

Research and organize literature for the Interdisciplinary paper

Incorporate health outcomes of the health promotion. Detection of disease and disease prevention.  Organize an interdisciplinary paper for your client and the delivery of safe and effective care. Choose a disease process and apply standards that are evidenced based which help support for the protection of your client.

Incorporate concepts from Care of the Aging weekly powerpoints and the book-Gerontological Nursing and Healthy Aging (Toughy & Jett, 2018).

Paper should be 3 pages not including title and reference page.

Paper should follow APA guidelines with a minimum of 5 references within 5 year span.

emerging technology surrounding transcription

/in /by

The Future of Transcription

Imagine that you are the supervisor of the transcription department. The HIM director has approached you about the future of the transcription role and the new emerging technology surrounding transcription. Prepare a PowerPoint slideshow that describes the current, traditional role and the future of transcription technology.

Your presentation should be a minimum of 8 slides (including a Title slide and References slide) and address the following:

  1. Current, traditional role of transcription.
  2. General explanation of speech recognition software and how it works.
  3. Three (3) specific examples of new transcription technology and the specs of each system. You will need to research specific systems such as Dragon Professional.
  4. The role of the medical scribe.
  5. The changing role of the transcriptionists an

Victimology

/in /by

Victimology

Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-203

ANDREW KARMEN John Jay College of Criminal Justice City University of New York

crime victims A N I N T R O D U C T I O N T O V I C T I M O L O G Y

N I N T H E D I T I O N

Australia Brazil Mexico Singapore United Kingdom United States

Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated. In whole or in part. WCN 02-200-203

Printed in the United States of America Print Number: 01 Print Year: 2015

Crime Victims: An Introduction to Victimology, Ninth Edition Andrew Karmen

Product Director: Marta Lee-Perriard

Sr. Product Manager: Carolyn Henderson Meier

Content Developer: Michael B. Kopf, S4Carlisle Publishing Services, Inc.

Product Assistant: Julia Catalano

Media Developer: Andy Yap

Marketing Manager: Kara Kindstrom

Art and Cover Direction, Production Management, and Composition: Lumina Datamatics, Inc.

Manufacturing Planner: Judy Inouye

Cover Image Credit: © Dmitrydesign/ Shutterstock

© 2016, 2013 Cengage Learning

WCN: 01-100-101

copyright herein

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this work covered by the copyright herein may be reproduced, transmitted, stored, or used in any form or by any means graphic, electronic, or mechanical. Including but not limited to photocopying, recording, scanning. Digitizing, taping, Web distribution, information networks, or information storage and retrieval systems . Except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act. Without the prior written permission of the publisher.

For product information and technology assistance. Contact us at Cengage Learning Customer & Sales Support, 1-800-354-9706.

For permission to use material from this text or product. Submit all requests online at www.cengage.com/permissions.

Further permissions questions can be e-mailed to permissionrequest@cengage.com.

Library of Congress Control Number: 2015932824

ISBN: 978-1-305-26103-7

Cengage Learning 20 Channel Center Street Boston, MA 02210 USA

Cengage Learning is a leading provider of customized learning solutions with employees. Residing in nearly 40 different countries and sales in more than 125 countries around the world. Find your local representative at www.cengage.com.

Cengage Learning products are represented in Canada by Nelson Education, Ltd.

To learn more about Cengage Learning Solutions, visit www.cengage.com.

Purchase any of our products at your local college store or at our preferred online store www.cengagebrain.com.

Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-203

Leadership and Management of Corrections

/in /by

The name of book if you can find it, If not I’m waiting for someone who took it to give me the login information to efollett, you may be able to google the information to complete assignment.

Correctional Administration: Integrating Theory and Practice by Richard P. Seiter.
Publisher: Pearson; 3rd edition (2017)
ISBN: 9780133770766

 

In Chapter 3 – Leadership and Management of Corrections, we learned of four categories of issues that confront and must be dealt with by correctional leaders and managers.

For this written assignment, you are to list and briefly summarize the four categories of issues confronting modern correctional administrators identified in your textbook. These are four concerns that have evolved and require correctional administrators to navigate their agencies into position to address these challenges or respond to new initiatives.

Your written response should be at least two paragraphs minimum.

 

Criminal Justice Policy Perception

/in /by

Criminal Justice Policy Perception

Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper, describing your personal perception of policymaking in criminal justice. Identify any assumptions on which your perceptions are based. Be sure to answer the following questions:

  • How would you describe policy-making?
  • How would you describe policy analysis?
  • What role does research play in criminal justice policy making?
  • How do your perceptions of criminal justice policy making and policy analysis compare to the definitions in the readings?
  • What are 2 to 3 examples of criminal justice policies?

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Liability And Quality

/in /by

Filbert’s Meat Shop, LLC shipped to Sonic Taco, a company based in Yuma, Arizona. Placed an order of chorizo and machaca beef. That same day, Filbert’s mailed an invoice for the order for $11,000. Based on the understanding that an oral contract existed between the parties . Whereby Sonic Taco had agreed to pay for the meat. Sonic Taco was engaged in the real estate business at this time. And had earlier been approached by Filbert’s Meat to discuss that company’s real estate investment potential.

Sonic Taco denied ever guaranteeing payment for the meat and raised the Uniform Commercial Codes Statute of Frauds, Section 2-201, as an affirmative defense. Filbert’s Meat Shop contended that because Sonic Taco was in the business of buying and selling real estate, and they possessed knowledge or skill peculiar to the practices involved in the transaction here. After hearing the evidence, the court concluded as a matter of law that Sonic Taco did agree to pay for the meat and was liable to Filbert’s Meat Shop in the amount of $11,000. Sonic Taco appealed.

In your discussion post, address the following questions:

  • Is this a case governed by the UCC?
  • If it was under common law, is the result different than the UCC?
  • How should the appeals court rule?

Your initial response should be a minimum of 200 words.

Supreme Court Decisions

/in /by

The Death Penalty

Chapter 17https://homeworkforyouhelper.com/

In This Chapter

Capital Punishment in Context

Supreme Court Decisions

Research on Capital Murder Trials

Racial Disparities and the Death Penalty

The Death Penalty as a Deterrent to Murder

Errors and Mistakes in Death Penalty Cases

Capital Punishment in Context

Statistics

U.S. one of few countries with death penalty

32 states, federal government, military authorize use of death penalty

Four states responsible for 59% of all U.S. executions since 1976: TX, OK, FL, VA; only for aggravated murder

Texas account for 38%

Under federal law, capital crimes include treason, espionage, murder in government official, using WMD

Supreme Court Decisions

Methods

Lethal injections, gas, electrocution, hanging, firing squad

Executions are rare

Perception of strong public support for the death penalty

Influences decision-making of politicians

Occasionally used by the Supreme Court as an indicator of prevailing “standards of decency” among the American public

Death penalty is costly

 

Supreme Court Decisions

 

Constitutional Challenges (Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments)

 

 

Furman v. Georgia (1972): United States Supreme Court unconstitutional as then administered

 

 

Gregg v. Georgia (1976): Guided discretion; bifurcated proceedings

 

 

Atkins v. Virginia (2002): Eliminated death sentence for execution of mentally retarded prisoners

 

 

Ring v. Arizona (2002): Only jury can make decisions regarding capital punishment

 

 

Roper v. Simmons (2005): Prohibits execution of juveniles

 

 

Kennedy v. Louisiana (2008): Prohibits execution for child rapist, unless child dies

 

 

Baze V, Rees (2008): Lethal injection does not inflect unnecessary or wanton pain

 

 

HOT TOPIC

Should we execute the elderly?

Most inmates die of natural causes on death row before they are sent to the execution chamber.