Need some help. This needs to be a script for a 5 minute speech. The topic and material I have submitted to this point is attached. Please let me know if you have any questions.

In this section you will focus on your script for the Oral Presentation of Capstone Research assignment. Once you are confident of the structure of your Final Capstone Research Paper, put the finishing touches on the accompanying Oral Presentation of Capstone Research (Scaffold Step #5). Be sure it reflects the latest findings from your research, and leads convincingly to your proposed solution!

As noted in Module 7, your presentation must:

• Frame the selected issue within your field of study
• Explain the significance of the issue
• Highlight key points of agreement and disagreement presented in the literature review
• Address the issues of diversity and ethics as they relate to your selected topic
• Reflect a reasoned analysis of the ethical issues and competing perspectives
• Use scholarly sources
• Reveal your proposed solution, how you arrived at it, and possible next steps

Your presentation should reflect appropriate critical thinking and senior-level oral and written communication skills. Remember to use internal transitions to help your audience stay on track.

Refer to the same event you wrote about in the Wk 1 assignment, Emergency Management Response Analysis Paper, Part A, and the selected articles about Hurricane Katrina.

Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper in which you analyze the work of the secondary responders (i.e., non-law enforcement, such as EPA, Coast Guard, engineers, etc.) in the aftermath of the emergency. Exclude details about police and fire response, as they are primary responders. In your paper:

• Detail roles within structured command (ICS).
• Outline applicable crisis response objectives.
• Discuss decision-making strategies and challenges faced by leaders in working through the event.

Provide support – use at least 1 and no more than 3 outside source/s (class reading material may be used)

No more than 20% of paper can be outside material.

You must cite any portions of your Part A paper that you use in this paper.

Format paper consistent with APA guidelines.

https://www.voanews.com/archive/hurricane-katrina-plans-decisions-and-lessons-learned

I’m attaching an internal link and the week 1 paper to refer to

The Meaning Of…..

Assignment Overview

The first major assignment in COMM 100W required that you write a paper consisting entirely of statements of fact. This second major assignment will also include statements of fact, but the goal of the essay is to establish something that cannot be empirically verified: the meaning of a word.

As you may have experienced when composing the Fact Paper, our ability to make an argument is limited when we cannot appeal to values. Contrary to the belief that values diminish the validity of an argument by rendering it mere opinion, values are a necessary part of argument. Indeed, they are the very heart of argument. This is the case in part because evaluative terms are notoriously difficult to define.

To establish what is meant by any evaluative word, we must rely on precedent and context. We can refer to authoritative sources such as dictionaries, but we must also take into account common usage and intent. In the case of words like hot, cold, short, or tall, there may be specific temperatures or heights that we can all agree define that term. There is no such widespread agreement for other evaluative terms, especially cultural values.

Cultural values are key terms to which we appeal again and again when deciding a course of action. They are values that most people would agree are fundamental to our society, even if we cannot agree on their definition. Examples of cultural values are: freedom, happiness, efficiency, maturity, ingenuity, independence, health, security, life, criminality, responsibility, and sustainability.

This assignment is designed to give you practice in another technique of persuasive writing, that of defining a cultural value or other key term in such a way that seems credible to your reader. Your ability to credibly define your terms will help you to contribute to a range of public discourse in influential ways.

Need the attached assignment done. Further details in the pics. Book:

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/13i0OT5vXTW…

Video link: 

Only reference should be the book and video

The teacher wants specific details about the project. It’s gonna be between 3-5 pages. The video starts from 21:23

All other instructions in the pics.

The purpose of this assignment is for you to choose a stance on a controversial issue and integrate your knowledge about rhetoric and persuasion to defend that stance. To do this effectively, you must conduct research on your topic and apply course concepts by creating a compelling and logical argument based on evidence.

Sources should be in APA. The sources should be 6 sources and u can increase too but use mine.

Please use the sources i have attached in each of the following attachments

Look at the requirements